Apparatus and methods for content transfer protection

ABSTRACT

Methods and apparatus for ensuring protection of transferred content. In one embodiment, content is transferred while enabling a network operator (e.g., MSO) to control and change rights and restrictions at any time, and irrespective of subsequent transfers. This is accomplished in one implementation by providing a premises device configured to receive content in a first encryption format and encodes using a first codec, with an ability to transcrypt and/or transcode the content into an encryption format and encoding format compatible with a device which requests the content therefrom (e.g., from PowerKey/MPEG-2 content to DRM/MPEG-4 content). The premises device uses the same content key to encrypt the content as is used by the requesting device to decrypt the content.

PRIORITY AND RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/425,880 filed on Feb. 6, 2017 of the same title, issuing on Aug. 14, 2018 as U.S. Pat. No. 10,050,945, which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/710,308 filed on Dec. 10, 2012 of the same title, issued on Feb. 7, 2017 as U.S. Pat. No. 9,565,472, each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Additionally, the present application is related to commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/584,208 filed on Oct. 20, 2006 and entitled “Downloadable Security and Protection Methods and Apparatus”, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,520,850, commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/657,828 filed on Jan. 24, 2007 and entitled “Apparatus and Methods for Provisioning in a Download-Enabled System”, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,621,540, commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/480,597 filed Jun. 8, 2009 and entitled “Media Bridge Apparatus and Methods”, now published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0313225, and commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/834,801 filed on Jan. 12, 2010 and entitled “Apparatus and Methods for Content Management and Account Linking Across Multiple Content Delivery Networks”, now published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0008786, each of the foregoing being incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

COPYRIGHT

A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.

BACKGROUND 1. Technology Field

The disclosure relates generally to the field of data and content distribution and delivery via a content distribution or other network. In one exemplary aspect, the disclosure relates to the delivery or transfer of content in a protected manner.

2. Description of Related Technology

A wide range of services and functions including e.g., digital programming (movies, etc.), digital video-on-demand (VOD), personal video recorder (PVR), Internet Protocol television (IPTV), digital media playback and recording, as well high-speed Internet access and IP-based telephony (e.g., VoIP), etc. are available for delivery to consumers at their premises for reasonable prices or subscription fees. Other services available to network users include access to and recording of digital music (e.g., MP3 files), as well local area networking (including wire-line and wireless local area networks or WLANs) for distributing these services throughout the user's premises, and beyond.

The foregoing services and functions may be provided to the user via a wide variety of different equipment environments including, inter alia, cable modems, Wi-Fi hubs, WMANs (such as e.g., WiMAX networks), Ethernet hubs, gateways, switches and routers, computers, servers, cable set-top boxes, public switched telephone networks (PSTNs), cellular telephones/smartphones (including e.g., LTE-enabled networks), tablet computers (including so-called “phablets”), and portable digital music devices. Additionally, the foregoing may be provided by one or more vendors or service providers including e.g., a cable service provider (e.g., MSO), cellular service provider (CSP), wireless service provider (WSP), VoIP service provider, music download service, Internet service provider (ISP), PSTN telephone service, etc., and/or content may be distributed between devices in any of the foregoing networks.

As the number of devices and providers increases, there is an increased need to provide integration across multiple delivery platforms and networks. Specifically, movement of content delivered by these services within the user's premises (and/or outside the premises, such as between networks) is often substantially frustrated, largely due to concerns relating to protection of valuable (e.g., copyrighted) content, and surreptitious reproduction and distribution thereof. Such unauthorized reproduction and distribution not only detracts from the network operator's revenue and commercial viability, but also that of the content source (e.g., movie studio, recording studio/artist, etc.).

Various methods have heretofore been employed by network operators in order to attempt to frustrate surreptitious access to, and copying and distribution of, valuable content. For example, conditional access (CA) technologies have been utilized for such purposes. Additionally, symmetric or asymmetric encryption technologies, such as those in accordance with the Data Encryption Standard (DES) technique or Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) may be used to secure content delivery. So-called “trusted domains” and digital rights management (DRM) solutions have also been utilized for this purpose. Each of these techniques is now described in greater detail.

Conditional Access

Conditional access (CA) technologies are typically incorporated into content-based networks, such technologies including the digital encoding of various types of data including audio and video programming and music. Conditional access can generally be defined as the control of when and how a user may view and use the associated programming or information. Different types of conditional access may be desirable in a network delivery system in order to, e.g., accommodate improvements in the technology over time, as well as different conditional access attributes such as security and category of programming or user access level.

A variety of traditional methods of conditional access exist including, e.g., “PowerKey”, NDS, and DigiCipher. A generalized conditional access model is also provided by the well-known DVB (Digital Video Broadcasting) Specification TS 101 197 V1.2.1 (02/02), DVB SimulCrypt; Part 1: “Head-end architecture and synchronization”, and TS 103 197 V1.2.1 (02/02): “Head-end Implementation of SimulCrypt”, each incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

FIG. 1a illustrates an exemplary prior art architecture 200 for providing content to a plurality of consumer premises equipment (CPE) via e.g., an HFC network using a conditional access scheme. Specifically, the network 100 distributes PowerKey protected content to the CPE. In order to access the content, each CPE utilizes the so-called “CableCard” plug-in security module access technology (also known as “a point-of-deployment (POD) module”). See, e.g., the CableCard-Host interface specification, which defines the interface between a digital cable receiver or STB (Host device) and the CableCard device provided by the MSO/cable operator. CableCard was developed to satisfy certain security requirements, and to allow retail availability of host devices, e.g., set-top boxes, digital cable ready televisions, DVRs, personal computers (PCs), integrated digital televisions, etc., for receiving cable services. The CableCard, comprising a PCMCIA device, can be inserted into a host device, allowing a viewer to receive cable systems' secure digital video services, e.g., pay-per-view (PPV) TV, electronic program guides, premium subscription channels, etc.

Specifically, the CableCard contains conditional access functionality, as well as the capability of converting messages to a common format. Thus, the CableCard provides a cable operator with a secure device at the subscriber premises, and acts as a translator so that the host device needs to understand a single protocol, regardless of the type of the network to which it is connected.

In FIG. 1a , the same PowerKey protected content (Content A) may therefore be sent to multiple CPE. Each CPE can then use its CableCard to access the content.

However, the requirement for a CableCard is comparatively tedious and expensive, especially given the recent trend toward home networking techniques which enable content transfer to and use on all of a user's devices (including personal computers, laptop and notebook computers, tablets, smartphones, etc.).

Moreover, the prior art PowerKey approach described above has no authentication entity or “proxy” that can authenticate CPE or other connected devices in anticipation of providing download services, no video (media) provisioning system, and hence by nature is highly localized.

“Trusted Domains”

Another related approach for content protection comprises the creation and enforcement of a “trusted domain” or TD. Specifically, such a trusted domain (TD) comprises an area (physically or virtually) within which programming or other content is protected from unauthorized access, distribution and copying. For example, in a cable network, a trusted domain may include not only the network portion where programming content traditionally is secured by, and within total control of, a cable operator (including, e.g., the headend, HFC delivery network, etc.,) but also user devices or CPE at subscribers' premises which are capable of receiving and securely storing programming content.

Using the trusted domain approach, the network operator can guarantee certain subscriber access, distribution, and usage policy enforcement with respect to content held within the domain. For example, a digital representation of a movie held within an operator's TD (e.g., on a hard drive of a user device) cannot be distributed over the Internet, wireless network, etc. in viewable form, and cannot become a source for duplication of multiple viewable copies.

Accordingly, a home network on which content may be transferred may be created; however, additional mechanisms are needed to ensure protection of the content within the trusted domain. One exemplary approach of implementing a trusted domain, described in co-owned U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0047957 filed Dec. 7, 2004 and entitled “TECHNIQUE FOR SECURELY COMMUNICATING PROGRAMMING CONTENT”, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,312,267 on Nov. 13, 2012, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, comprises using two cryptographic elements (e.g., encryption keys), associated with a user and his/her client device(s), respectively, that control access to content stored in the client device(s) within the domain. For example, the content stored in the client device may be encrypted using a private or secret key in accordance with the Data Encryption Standard (DES) or Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) algorithms. When the encrypted content is transported from the client device to another device within the domain associated with the same user (or other common parameter or feature), the second device needs the cryptographic element (e.g., the secret key) to decrypt the encrypted content. To that end, the second device also receives from the source device an encrypted version of this secret key. The latter is generated by encrypting the secret key using a second and distinct cryptographic element (e.g., a public key in accordance with a public key algorithm) associated with the subscriber. The second device provides the encrypted version of the secret key to a remote apparatus, e.g., in a headend, where the secret key is recovered based on at least the encrypted version of the secret key and data relating to that user or client device. The second device then receives from the head-end another encrypted version of the secret key, which is generated by encrypting the recovered secret key using a third cryptographic element (e.g., a public key in accordance with a public key algorithm) associated with the second device. Based on at least this second encrypted version of the secret key, the secret key can be recovered in the second device to decrypt the encrypted content.

However, generally speaking, any “trusted domains” that might be established are not extendable beyond the CPE on the client side of the delivery network.

Digital Rights Management (DRM)

Another approach used to control the distribution and use of protected content within a content-based network is to employ so-called digital rights management (DRM). For example, Media rights management systems such as the Microsoft Windows® Media Digital Rights Manager (DRM), may be used.

FIG. 1b illustrates an exemplary prior art network for transfer of content using DRM techniques. As shown, the network generally comprises a content server in communication with a plurality of client devices (CPE 1, CPE2, etc.) via a hybrid fiber-coaxial (HFC) network.

First content, Content A-1 is provided to a first CPE (CPE 1), upon request therefor. The digital media or content is encrypted and locked with a “license key” that is particular to the requesting device (DRM License 1). The license key is stored in a license file or other data structure which is distributed separately from the media or content to the requesting device. A user can obtain the encrypted media file from a content server (such as by, e.g., receiving it in a broadcast, downloading it from a web site, purchasing it on a physical media, etc.). To play the digital media file, the user must acquire the license file including the license key for that media file from a DRM server. The user acquires the license key by accessing a pre-delivered license (which includes license terms or policies). Alternatively, when the user plays the file for the first time, a procedure is invoked for retrieving the license via a network connection or other delivery mode (e.g., the Internet). After obtaining the license with the license key, the user is able to access the media file according to the rules or rights specified in the license policies.

It is noted that, in FIG. 1b , the system operator (e.g., MSO) provides a means for encrypting the requested content with the device-specific license key to create the secured content file (Content A-1). The requesting CPE (CPE 1) will require the DRM license (DRM License 1) to access the content in the file as discussed above. In order to ensure that the requesting device and/or user is entitled to access the content, an association or data record is generated and maintained at a database at the network headend. Upon request for the DRM license, the DRM server determines whether the user/device is entitled to access prior to providing the DRM license thereto.

The DRM license includes rights of the devices and/or users, the rights determine aspects of the playback, copying, transfer, etc. of the content. The content source may set the usage rules and policies for licensing the content. When the user/device requests the DRM license from the DRM server, such as via a trusted software client, the rights particular to that user are utilized. The trusted client retrieves the content file and the content key, which it uses to then access the content.

As illustrated in FIG. 1b , when a second CPE (CPE 2) requests the same content (Content A), the content server provides content encrypted with a content key specific to the second device thereby creating a Content A-2 version of the requested content. Likewise, the DRM server will provide CPE 2 with DRM License 2 for accessing the protected content.

However, as previously noted, existing DRM technologies utilize device-specific encryption/decryption keys. Such DRM-based systems are accordingly incompatible with the previously referenced home networking models, as the transfer thereon would result in either (i) content that is not usable at the receiving device (due to failure to possess the appropriate license key or file), or (ii) simply a transfer of the content in an unprotected form.

Moreover, similar to CA technologies, the DRM approach described above has no authentication entity or “proxy” that can authenticate CPE or other connected devices in anticipation of providing download services, no video (media) provisioning system, and hence by nature is highly localized.

Various other technologies have demonstrated an ability to transfer content within a home network; however, such systems either do not use any DRM content protection, or utilize in-home DRM license generation for content protection. For example, the Motorola Televation™ device receives PowerKey signaling, and securely translates the rights and restrictions of that content from the PowerKey signaling to an Internet Protocol Rights Management-Home Network (IPRM-HN)/SecureMedia in-home DRM license. However, as discussed herein, in-home DRM license generation requires sharing sensitive information with the in-home device. Therefore, this mechanism dilutes the security of the DRM system, and may threaten the protection of the content.

Accordingly, improved apparatus and methods for distributing digital services to (and within) a user's premises are needed. Such improved apparatus and methods would ideally provide protection of content within the user's premises network, as well as outside of the premises network and across other networks.

In addition, the improved apparatus and methods would ideally enable content transfer within a given premises network in accordance with the rights established for the specific content, user, and/or rendering or storage device, without diluting or otherwise compromising the security of the transferred content.

SUMMARY

The foregoing needs are addressed herein by providing, inter alia, methods and apparatus for content transfer protection.

In a first aspect, a premises gateway apparatus configured to provide content to one or more client devices in communication therewith is disclosed. In one embodiment, said gateway apparatus includes: at least one first interface configured to permit communication between the gateway apparatus and a first network at least one second interface configured to communicate with said one or more client devices; a storage apparatus; and a digital processor configured to run at least one computer program thereon. In one variant, said computer program comprises a plurality of instructions which are configured to, when executed by said digital processor: request and receive said content and a content key from said first network via said first interface; receive a request from at least one of said one or more client devices for said content; decrypt said content via said content key; transcode said content from a first encoding format to a second encoding format, said second encoding format being compatible with capabilities of said at least one of said one or more client devices; re-encrypt said content via said content key; and provide said content to said at least one of said one or more client devices via said second interface.

In a second aspect, a method of providing content to one or more client devices is disclosed. In one embodiment, the one or more client devices are operative in a premises network sub-portion of a content delivery network, and said method includes: receiving said content at an intermediary entity of said premises network from a content server of said content delivery network, said content being encrypted according to a first access control standard; receiving a rights package from said content delivery network; receiving a request for said content from at least one of said one or more client devices in said premises network; and substantially in response to said request, said intermediary entity: decrypting said content via at least information received in said rights package; transcoding said content from a first encoding format to a second encoding format; re-encrypting said content according to a second access control standard; and providing said content to said at least one of said one or more client devices.

In a third aspect, a digital video recorder (DVR) apparatus configured to enable synchronization of content to one or more portable media devices (PMDs) is disclosed. In one embodiment, said DVR includes: at least one first interface configured to communicate with one or more entities of a content delivery network; a second interface configured to communicate with said one or more PMDs; a storage entity configured to store a plurality of encrypted content received from a content server of said content delivery network; and a processor configured to: run at least a digital rights management (DRM) client application thereon, said DRM client application configured to request and receive a DRM license from said content delivery network; and run at least one second computer application. In one variant, said computer program comprises a plurality of instructions which are configured to, when executed: receive a request for first content from said one or more PMD; identify said first content among said plurality of encrypted content stored at said storage entity; decrypt said first content via at least information contained in said DRM license; determine whether said identified first content comprises a format compatible with said one or more PMD; when it is determined that said format is not compatible, transcode said first content to a format compatible with said one or more PMD; re-encrypt said first content according to DRM standards; and provide said content to said one or more PMD.

In a fourth aspect, a method of synchronizing content from a first premises device to at least one portable device in communication therewith is disclosed. In one embodiment, said method includes: storing at least first content at a storage entity of said first in-home device, said at least first content being stored in a first encrypted format; requesting and storing a license via a client application running on said first premises device, said license received from a server in direct or indirect communication with said first premises device; receiving a request at said first premises device for said first content stored at said storage entity from said portable device; using at least information contained in said license to decrypt said first content from said first encrypted format and re-encrypt said first content to a second encrypted format; transcoding said first content from a first encoding format not compatible with said portable device to a second encoding format compatible with said portable device; and synchronizing said transcoded and re-encrypted first content to said portable device.

In a fifth aspect, a computer readable apparatus is disclosed. In one embodiment, the computer readable apparatus is configured to run at least one computer program thereon, the computer program comprising a plurality of instructions which are configured to, when executed, provide content to one or more client devices.

In a sixth aspect, a system is disclosed. In one embodiment, the system comprises a network for providing content to a gateway device, the gateway device configured to process the content and provide the same to one or more client devices in communication therewith.

In a seventh aspect, a client device is disclosed. In one embodiment, the client device is configured to receive content synchronized from a gateway apparatus.

Other features and advantages of the present disclosure will immediately be recognized by persons of ordinary skill in the art with reference to the attached drawings and detailed description of exemplary embodiments as given below.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1a and 1b are a block diagrams illustrating typical prior art implementations of network architectures for providing protected content to a plurality of client devices in a network.

FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram illustrating an exemplary HFC cable network configuration useful with the present disclosure.

FIG. 2a is a functional block diagram illustrating one exemplary HFC cable network headend configuration useful with the present disclosure.

FIG. 2b is a functional block diagram illustrating one exemplary local service node configuration useful with the present disclosure.

FIG. 2c is a functional block diagram illustrating one exemplary broadcast switched architecture (BSA) network useful with the present disclosure.

FIG. 2d is a functional block diagram illustrating one exemplary packetized content delivery network architecture useful with the present disclosure.

FIGS. 3a and 3b are block diagrams illustrating exemplary embodiments of network architecture s for transferring protected content according to the present disclosure.

FIGS. 4a and 4b are logical flow diagrams illustrating exemplary embodiments of methods for transferring protected content according to the present disclosure.

FIG. 5a is a functional block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a gateway apparatus and of a consumer premises apparatus (CPE) for the transfer of protected content according to the disclosure.

FIG. 5b is a functional block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a digital video recorder (DVR) apparatus and of a portable media device (PMD) for the transfer of protected content according to the disclosure.

All Figures© Copyright 2012 Time Warner Cable, Inc. All rights reserved.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Reference is now made to the drawings, wherein like numerals refer to like parts throughout.

As used herein, the term “application” refers generally and without limitation to a unit of executable software that implements a certain functionality or theme. The themes of applications vary broadly across any number of disciplines and functions (such as on-demand content management, e-commerce transactions, brokerage transactions, home entertainment, calculator etc.), and one application may have more than one theme. The unit of executable software generally runs in a predetermined environment; for example, the unit could comprise a downloadable Java Xlet™ that runs within the JavaTV™ environment.

As used herein, the terms “client device” and “end user device” include, but are not limited to, set-top boxes (e.g., DSTBs), gateways, DVRs, modems, personal computers (PCs), and minicomputers, whether desktop, laptop, or otherwise, and mobile devices such as handheld computers, PDAs, personal media devices (PMDs), tablets, and smartphones.

As used herein, the term “codec” refers to a video, audio, or other data coding and/or decoding algorithm, process or apparatus including, without limitation, those of the MPEG (e.g., MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4/H.264, etc.), Real (RealVideo, etc.), AC-3 (audio), DiVX, XViD/ViDX, Windows Media Video (e.g., WMV 7, 8, 9, 10, or 11), ATI Video codec, or VC-1 (SMPTE standard 421M) families.

As used herein, the term “computer program” or “software” is meant to include any sequence or human or machine cognizable steps which perform a function. Such program may be rendered in virtually any programming language or environment including, for example, C/C++, Fortran, COBOL, PASCAL, assembly language, markup languages (e.g., HTML, SGML, XML, VoXML), and the like, as well as object-oriented environments such as the Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA), Java™ (including J2ME, Java Beans, etc.), Binary Runtime Environment (e.g., BREW), and the like.

The terms “Consumer Premises Equipment (CPE)” and “host device” refer without limitation to any type of electronic equipment located within a consumer's or user's premises and connected to a network. The term “host device” includes terminal devices that have access to digital television content via a satellite, cable, or terrestrial network. The host device functionality may be integrated into a digital television (DTV) set. The term “consumer premises equipment” (CPE) includes such electronic equipment such as set-top boxes, televisions, Digital Video Recorders (DVR), gateway storage devices (Furnace), and ITV Personal Computers.

As used herein, the term “database” refers generally to one or more tangible or virtual data storage locations, which may or may not be physically co-located with each other or other system components.

As used herein, the term “display” refers any type of device adapted to display information, including without limitation CRTs, LCDs, TFTs, plasma displays, LEDs, incandescent and fluorescent devices. Display devices may also include less dynamic devices such as, for example, printers, e-ink devices, and the like.

As used herein, the term “DVR” (digital video recorder) refers generally to any type or recording mechanism and/or software environment whereby content sent over a network can be recorded and selectively recalled. Such DVR may be dedicated in nature, or part of a non-dedicated or multi-function system.

As used herein, the term “DOCSIS” refers to any of the existing or planned variants of the Data Over Cable Services Interface Specification, including for example DOCSIS versions 1.0, 1.1, 2.0 and 3.0.

As used herein, the term “gateway” includes, without limitation, devices configured to interface with a network, and pass signals to or exchange signals with, another device in communication therewith. Various exemplary gateways are described in, inter alia, co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/818,236 filed on Jun. 13, 2007 entitled “PREMISES GATEWAY APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR USE IN A CONTENT-BASED NETWORK”, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,954,131 on May 31, 2011, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/582,619 filed on Oct. 20, 2009 and entitled “GATEWAY APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR DIGITAL CONTENT DELIVERY IN A NETWORK”, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,027,062 on May 5, 2015, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/480,597 filed on Jun. 8, 2009 and entitled “MEDIA BRIDGE APPARATUS AND METHODS”, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,602,864 on Mar. 21, 2017, each of the foregoing being incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

As used herein, the term “headend” refers generally to a networked system controlled by an operator (e.g., an MSO or multiple systems operator) that distributes programming to MSO clientele using client devices. Such programming may include literally any information source/receiver including, inter alia, free-to-air TV channels, pay TV channels, interactive TV, and the Internet.

As used herein, the terms “Internet” and “internet” are used interchangeably to refer to inter-networks including, without limitation, the Internet.

As used herein, the terms “microprocessor” and “digital processor” are meant generally to include all types of digital processing devices including, without limitation, digital signal processors (DSPs), reduced instruction set computers (RISC), general-purpose (CISC) processors, microprocessors, gate arrays (e.g., FPGAs), PLDs, reconfigurable computer fabrics (RCFs), array processors, secure microprocessors, and application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs). Such digital processors may be contained on a single unitary IC die, or distributed across multiple components.

As used herein, the terms “MSO” or “multiple systems operator” refer without limitation to a cable, fiber to the home (FTTH), fiber to the curb (FTTC), satellite, Hybrid Fiber Copper (HFCu), or terrestrial network provider having infrastructure required to deliver services including programming and data over those mediums.

As used herein, the terms “network” and “bearer network” refer generally to any type of telecommunications or data network including, without limitation, hybrid fiber coax (HFC) networks, HFCu networks, satellite networks, telco networks, and data networks (including MANs, WANs, LANs, WLANs, internets, and intranets). Such networks or portions thereof may utilize any one or more different topologies (e.g., ring, bus, star, loop, etc.), transmission media (e.g., wired/RF cable, RF wireless, millimeter wave, optical, etc.) and/or communications or networking protocols.

As used herein, the term “interface” refers to any signal, data, or software interface with a component, network or process including, without limitation, those of the FireWire (e.g., FW400, FW800, etc.), USB (e.g., USB2), Ethernet (e.g., 10/100, 10/100/1000 (Gigabit Ethernet), 10-Gig-E, etc.), MoCA, Coaxsys (e.g., TVnet™), radio frequency tuner (e.g., in-band or OOB, cable modem, etc.), Wi-Fi (802.11), WiMAX (802.16), PAN (e.g., 802.15), cellular (e.g., 3G; LTE/LTE-A/TD-LTE, GSM, etc.) or IrDA families.

As used herein, the term “node” refers to any functional entity associated with a network, such as for example an OLT or ONU, whether physically discrete or distributed across multiple locations.

As used herein, the term “QAM” refers to modulation schemes used for sending signals over cable networks. Such modulation scheme might use any constellation level (e.g. QPSK, 16-QAM, 64-QAM, 256-QAM, etc.) depending on details of a cable network. A QAM may also refer to a physical channel modulated according to the schemes.

As used herein, the term “server” refers to any computerized component, system or entity regardless of form which is adapted to provide data, files, applications, content, or other services to one or more other devices or entities on a computer system or network.

As used herein, the terms “service”, “content”, and “stream” are sometimes used synonymously to refer to a sequence of packetized data that is provided in what a subscriber may perceive as a service. A “service” (or “content”, or “stream”) in the former, specialized sense may correspond to different types of services in the latter, non-technical sense. For example, a “service” in the specialized sense may correspond to, among others, video broadcast, audio-only broadcast, pay-per-view, or video-on-demand. The perceivable content provided on such a “service” may be live, pre-recorded, delimited in time, undelimited in time, or of other descriptions. In some cases, a “service” in the specialized sense may correspond to what a subscriber would perceive as a “channel” in traditional broadcast television.

As used herein, the term “service group” refers without limitation to either a group of service users (e.g., subscribers), or the resources shared by them in the form of, for example, entire cable RF signal, only the RF channels used to receive the service or otherwise treated as a single logical unit by the network for resource assignment.

As used herein, the term “user interface” refers to, without limitation, any visual, graphical, tactile, audible, sensory, or other means of providing information to and/or receiving information from a user or other entity.

As used herein, the term “Wi-Fi” refers to, without limitation, any of the variants of IEEE-Std. 802.11 or related standards including 802.11a/b/g/n/s/v or 802.11-2012.

As used herein, the term “wireless” means any wireless signal, data, communication, or other interface including without limitation Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, 3G (3GPP/3GPP2), HSDPA/HSUPA, TDMA, CDMA (e.g., IS-95A, WCDMA, etc.), FHSS, DSSS, GSM, PAN/802.15, WiMAX (802.16), 802.20, narrowband/FDMA, OFDM, PCS/DCS, LTE/LTE-A/TD-LTE, analog cellular, CDPD, satellite systems, millimeter wave or microwave systems, acoustic, and infrared (i.e., IrDA).

Overview

In one salient aspect, the present disclosure provides methods and apparatus for transferring protected content. In one embodiment, the content is delivered via a managed content distribution network (such as a cable or satellite or HFCu network having an MSO), wherein the MSO manages the rights and restrictions of the content outside of a premises, and in a data center or headend, by providing requested content to a gateway device within the premises.

The content is, in the exemplary embodiment, provided in a first encryption format and encoded using a first codec, both of which are compatible with the gateway device. In order to provide for a transfer of the content within and outside of the premises network, the gateway is configured to transcrypt the content into an encryption format, and transcode using a codec, that are each compatible with a device which requests the content therefrom. In one implementation, the content is received at the gateway as MPEG-2 content encrypted using Powerkey conditional access (CA) technology. The gateway uses its associated CableCard to decrypt the content, and a transcoder entity to transcode the content to e.g., MPEG-4 (or other appropriate format). The content is then re-encrypted to DRM using a content key obtained from a DRM server and a transcrypter of the gateway. This approach advantageously preserves content rights and asserts restrictions on use or distribution of content, via the user's premises gateway.

The exemplary gateway apparatus then transmits the content to a requesting client device (e.g., CPE), the CPE must use the same content key to decrypt the content as was used by the gateway when the content was transcrypted. Therefore, the gateway and devices in communication with the gateway (and which would presumably request content therefrom) are established to use the same DRM client.

In another embodiment, content is transferred from a DVR to other portable devices in communication therewith. to the DVR receives content in a first format and encryption scheme, and transcodes and/or transcrypts the content to a format and scheme with which requesting devices are compatible. In one exemplary implementation, the requirement for transcryption is removed by using the same DRM algorithm to protect content on both the DVR and the requesting devices. In one variant, the DVR and the requesting devices each use the same DRM client to request a DRM license from a DRM server.

Using the same algorithm for both client applications advantageously enables the MSO to control and change usage rights and restrictions at any time up through content playback, and regardless of any transfer of the content between devices (i.e., between the gateway and/or DVR and the requesting devices in communication therewith).

Detailed Description of Exemplary Embodiments

Exemplary embodiments of the apparatus and methods for transferring protected content of the present disclosure are now described in detail. While these exemplary embodiments are described in the context of a hybrid fiber coax (HFC) cable architecture having a multiple systems operator (MSO), digital networking capability, and plurality of client devices/CPE, the general principles and advantages of the disclosure may be extended to other types of networks and architectures, whether broadband, narrowband, wired or wireless, content or data, or otherwise. Hence, the following description is merely exemplary in nature. For example, the disclosure may be practiced over a fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) or fiber-to-the-curb (FTTC) system, hybrid fiber-copper (HFCu) network, or over satellite or millimeter wave-based networks having two-way capabilities similar to today's digital cable HFC networks.

It will also be appreciated that while described generally in the context of a network providing service to a customer or consumer (i.e., residential) end user domain, the present disclosure may be readily adapted to other types of environments including, e.g., commercial/enterprise, and government/military applications. Myriad other applications are possible.

Bearer Network Architecture

FIG. 2 illustrates a typical content distribution network configuration with which the apparatus and methods of the present disclosure may be used. The various components of the network 207 include (i) one or more data and application origination points 202; (ii) one or more content sources 203, (iii) one or more application distribution servers 204; (iv) one or more VOD servers 205, and (v) consumer premises equipment (CPE) 206. The distribution server(s) 204, VOD servers 205 and CPE(s) 206 are connected via a bearer (e.g., HFC) network 201. A simple architecture comprising one of each of the aforementioned components 202, 204, 205, 206 is shown in FIG. 2 for simplicity, although it will be recognized that comparable architectures with multiple origination points, distribution servers, VOD servers, and/or CPE devices (as well as different network topologies) may be utilized consistent with the disclosure. For example, the headend architecture of FIG. 2a (described in greater detail below) may be used.

The data/application origination point 202 comprises any medium that allows data and/or applications (such as a VOD-based application, gaming application, or “Watch TV” application) to be transferred to a distribution server 204. This can include for example a third party data source, application vendor website, CD-ROM, external network interface, mass storage device (e.g., RAID system), etc. Such transference may be automatic, initiated upon the occurrence of one or more specified events (such as the receipt of a request packet or ACK), performed manually, or accomplished in any number of other modes readily recognized by those of ordinary skill.

The application distribution server 204 comprises a computer system where such applications can enter the network system. Distribution servers are well known in the networking arts, and accordingly not described further herein.

The VOD server 205 comprises a computer system where on-demand content can be received from one or more of the aforementioned data sources 202 and enter the network system. These servers may generate the content locally, or alternatively act as a gateway or intermediary from a distant source.

The CPE 206 includes any equipment in the “customers' premises” (or other locations, whether local or remote to the servers 204, 205) that can be accessed by a distribution server 204 or VOD server 205.

Referring now to FIG. 2a , one exemplary embodiment of headend architecture useful with the present disclosure is described. As shown in FIG. 2a , the headend architecture 250 comprises typical headend components and services including billing module 252, subscriber management system (SMS) and CPE configuration management module 254, cable-modem termination system (CMTS) and OOB system 256, as well as LAN(s) 258, 260 placing the various components in data communication with one another. It will be appreciated that while a bar or bus LAN topology is illustrated, any number of other arrangements as previously referenced (e.g., ring, star, etc.) may be used consistent with the disclosure. It will also be appreciated that the headend configuration depicted in FIG. 2a is high-level, conceptual architecture and that each MSO may have multiple headends deployed using custom architectures.

The architecture 250 of FIG. 2a further includes a multiplexer/encrypter/modulator (MEM) 262 coupled to the HFC network 201 adapted to “condition” content for transmission over the network. The distribution servers 264 are coupled to the LAN 260, which provides access to the MEM 262 and network 201 via one or more file servers 270. The VOD servers 205 are coupled to the LAN 260 as well, although other architectures may be employed (such as for example where the VOD servers are associated with a core switching device such as an 802.3z Gigabit Ethernet device). As previously described, information is carried across multiple channels. Thus, the headend must be adapted to acquire the information for the carried channels from various sources. Typically, the channels being delivered from the headend 250 to the CPE 206 (“downstream”) are multiplexed together in the headend and sent to neighborhood hubs (FIG. 2b ) via a variety of interposed network components.

Content (e.g., audio, video, data, applications, etc.) is provided in each downstream (in-band) channel associated with the relevant service group. To communicate with the headend or intermediary node (e.g., hub server), the CPE 206 may use the out-of-band (OOB) or DOCSIS channels and associated protocols. The OCAP 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 (and subsequent) specification provides for exemplary networking protocols both downstream and upstream, although the disclosure is in no way limited to these approaches.

As shown in FIG. 2b , the network 201 of FIGS. 2 and 2 a comprises a fiber/coax arrangement wherein the output of the MEM 262 of FIG. 2a is transferred to the optical domain (such as via an optical transceiver 277 at the headend or further downstream). The optical domain signals are then distributed to a fiber node 278, which further distributes the signals over a distribution network 280 to a plurality of local servicing nodes 282. This provides an effective 1:N expansion of the network at the local service end.

“Switched” Networks

FIG. 2c illustrates an exemplary “switched” network architecture also useful with the present disclosure. Switching architectures allow improved efficiency of bandwidth use for ordinary digital broadcast programs. Ideally, the subscriber will be unaware of any difference between programs delivered using a switched network and ordinary streaming broadcast delivery.

FIG. 2c shows the implementation details of one exemplary embodiment of this broadcast switched network architecture. Specifically, the headend 250 contains switched broadcast control and media path functions 290, 292; these element cooperating to control and feed, respectively, downstream or edge switching devices 294 at the hub site which are used to selectively switch broadcast streams to various service groups. A BSA server 296 is also typically disposed at the hub site, and implements functions related to switching and bandwidth conservation (in conjunction with a management entity 298 disposed at the headend). An optical transport ring 297 is utilized to distribute the dense wave-division multiplexed (DWDM) optical signals to each hub in an efficient fashion.

Co-owned U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0056217 filed Sep. 20, 2001 and entitled “TECHNIQUE FOR EFFECTIVELY PROVIDING PROGRAM MATERIAL IN A CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM”, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,713,623 on Apr. 29, 2014, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, describes one exemplary broadcast switched digital architecture useful with the present disclosure, although it will be recognized by those of ordinary skill that other approaches and architectures may be substituted.

In addition to “broadcast” content (e.g., video programming), the systems of FIGS. 2a-2c can also deliver Internet data services using the Internet protocol (IP), although other protocols and transport mechanisms of the type well known in the digital communication art may be substituted. One exemplary delivery paradigm comprises delivering MPEG-based video content (e.g., “IPTV” or the like), with the video transported to user PCs (or IP-based STBs) over the aforementioned DOCSIS channels comprising MPEG (or other video codec such as H.264 or AVC) over IP over MPEG. That is, the higher layer MPEG- or other encoded content is encapsulated using an IP protocol, which then utilizes an MPEG packetization of the type well known in the art for delivery over the RF channels. In this fashion, a parallel delivery mode to the normal broadcast delivery exists; i.e., delivery of video content both over traditional downstream QAMs to the tuner of the user's STB or other receiver device for viewing on the television, and also as packetized IP data over the DOCSIS QAMs to the user's PC or other IP-enabled device via the user's cable or other modem.

Referring again to FIG. 2c , the IP packets associated with Internet services are received by edge switch 294, and forwarded to the cable modem termination system (CMTS) 299. The CMTS examines the packets, and forwards packets intended for the local network to the edge switch 294. Other packets are discarded or routed to another component. The edge switch 294 forwards the packets receive from the CMTS 299 to the QAM modulator 289, which transmits the packets on one or more physical (QAM-modulated RF) channels to the CPEs (or CD). The IP packets are typically transmitted on RF channels that are different than the RF channels used for the broadcast video and audio programming, although this is not a requirement. The CPE 206 are each configured to monitor the particular assigned RF channel (such as via a port or socket ID/address, or other such mechanism) for IP packets intended for the subscriber premises/address that they serve.

Packet-Optimized Architectures

While the foregoing network architectures described herein can (and in fact do) carry packetized content (e.g., IP over MPEG for high-speed data or Internet TV, MPEG-2 packet content over QAM for MPTS, etc.), they are often not optimized for such delivery. Hence, in accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure, a “packet optimized” delivery network is used for carriage of the packet content (e.g., IPTV content) when the request issues from an MSO network (see discussion of FIG. 2a below). FIG. 2d illustrates one exemplary implementation of such a network, in the context of an IMS (IP Multimedia Subsystem) network with common control plane and service delivery platform (SDP), as described in co-pending U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0103374 filed on Apr. 21, 2010 and entitled “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR PACKETIZED CONTENT DELIVERY OVER A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK”, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,264,029 on Apr. 16, 2019, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Such a network provides significant enhancements in terms of common control of different services, implementation and management of content delivery sessions according to unicast or multicast models, quality-of-service (QoS) for IP-packetized content streams, etc.; however, it is appreciated that the various features of the present disclosure are in no way limited to any of the foregoing architectures.

Protected Content Transfer Network Architectures

The following figures illustrate exemplary architectures, methods, and apparatus for providing improved systems for the transfer of content to and within a premises network. It is appreciated that although illustrated and discussed with respect to an HFC network, and Powerkey or DRM encryption, the present disclosure may be applied across any number of networks (including e.g., satellite, Internet, cellular, etc.) and encryption or content protection schemes (such as other CA, TD, and/or DRM configurations).

Referring now to FIG. 3a , an exemplary inventive network 300 configuration according to the present disclosure is illustrated. As shown, the limitations of the prior art configurations are overcome in that, inter alia, content is provided from a content server 302 to a home gateway device 312, which in turn is configured to transmit content to various client devices 206 in communication therewith. Although illustrated with respect to an HFC content delivery network such as the network 201 of FIG. 2 herein, it is appreciated that the content server 302 may communicate to the client devices 206 via any other type of content delivery network, such as e.g., an internetwork, a satellite network, HFCu network, etc.

Consistent with prior art methods for delivering protected content to a first device (see e.g., FIG. 1a above), the content is provided from the content server 302 to the gateway 312 via the interposed delivery network. In one embodiment, the content is transmitted as MPEG-2 content using PowerKey conditional access technology (applied at a PowerKey encryption entity 304). However, in the illustrated inventive system, the gateway 312 is configured to process the received content, and transmit the content to the various CPE 206 in communication therewith. The gateway 312 cannot transmit PowerKey content to CPE 206 which do not have CableCards. Thus, in order to preserve rights and assert restrictions for the content, the gateway 312 processes the content by translating it from PowerKey MPEG-2 content to DRM MPEG-4 content. In other words, in the exemplary implementation, DRM is applied at same time as the content is processed from MPEG-2 to MPEG-4 by the gateway 312. It is appreciated, however, that in the instance that the receiving device utilizes MPEG-2 (or can utilize multiple formats including MPEG-2), the translation step may be omitted.

As noted above, in certain instances it may be necessary to transcode content from, for example, MPEG-2 to MPEG-4. This is accomplished via one or more prior art methods which decode the MPEG-2 content, then subsequently re-encode the content as MPEG-4.

The application of DRM involves having many proprietary DRM “secrets”; in this case, they would need to be known by the gateway 312 performing the content translation. In other words, in order to generate a DRM license, the gateway 312 would require all the secrets that are built into a DRM license server. However, because the gateway 312 is located in the user's premises, this would in essence mean that every premises that has the translation device (i.e., gateway 312) must also contain the proprietary DRM secrets. Such a configuration would, inter alia, significantly dilute the security of the DRM system. It is noted that the rights and restrictions are known at the time the content is generated (i.e., at the content server 302), and can be captured in both PowerKey and DRM license prior to content translation. Hence, the present embodiment of the inventive architecture utilizes a DRM license generated elsewhere (e.g., at a network-based DRM server 308). This approach enables the DRM secrets to remain in a physically safe environment (i.e., the network headend and/or secure DRM server), and out of the user's premises. This also enables the translation device (i.e., gateway 312) to implement a common DRM client to retrieve the key, which it then uses to encrypt the content. Since DRM technologies utilize the same content key for encryption and decryption, the gateway 312 requests the DRM license from the DRM server 308 using the same DRM client as will be later used by the CPE 206 when requesting content (see discussion below), and uses the key contained therein to re-encrypt the content (from PowerKey to DRM).

In order to enable the foregoing functionality, the DRM server 308 of the illustrated embodiment keeps a table of available content (and a content key which corresponds to each); i.e., the content key table 310. When the gateway 312 requests the DRM license (in order to re-encrypt the content), the DRM server 310 consults an entitlements database 306 to determine whether the gateway 312 is associated to an authenticated user, and/or whether the device or user is authorized to obtain access to the content. In addition, the rights and restrictions of the user and/or device are also determined in this embodiment via cooperation of the entitlements database 306, the DRM server 310 and other entities of the headend network (such as those associated with billing, account management, etc.; not shown). These are utilized by the DRM server 310 when developing the DRM license. The rights and restrictions may include without limitation: (i) HDMI only, (ii) copy never, (iii) copy once, (iv) copy unlimited, (iv) number of simultaneous devices allowed, (vi) duration of use/rental, and (viii) ability to view off-line. As noted above, the gateway 312 of the illustrated embodiment utilizes the key contained within the DRM license to re-encrypt content received from the content server 302 from the exemplary PowerKey format to a DRM format. Similarly, when the user device 206 begins to play the content (which was transferred to it from the gateway 312), the device 206 discovers that the content is encrypted, and requests the DRM licenses (containing the content key) for that content directly from the DRM server 310. Based on one or more business policies set by the network operator, the DRM server 310 grants or denies the request for the content key to that user and/or device 206, based on entitlement information obtained from the entitlements database 306. An exemplary entitlements architecture and method useful with the present disclosure is set forth in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/536,724 filed on Aug. 6, 2009 and entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING ENTITLEMENTS TO DATA OVER A NETWORK”, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,341,242 on Dec. 25, 2012, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Assuming the user and/or device 206 is entitled, the DRM server 310 packages the content key along with the rights and restrictions in a DRM license, which is also encrypted in a way that only the requesting user device 206 can access the contents of the DRM license.

In one embodiment, this is accomplished via utilization of public/private key pair encryption schemes. It is appreciated however, that a DRM vendor may use proprietary mechanisms for ensuring that only trusted DRM clients can access the contents of only the DRM license to which that DRM client is entitled.

In one exemplary embodiment, the gateway 312 is configured to run a DRM client thereon, which is configured to request the DRM licenses from the DRM server 310 as if the gateway was the consuming device. Additionally, the gateway is further configured to run at least one computer program for decrypting the content, and re-encrypting the content using the content key from the DRM license.

With respect to content stored on a DVR, current systems use proprietary encryption algorithms at the DVR to protect content on the hard drive. Under these systems, the content must be transcrypted in order to enable DRM applications (such as e.g., the commercially available Allway® Sync n' Go DRM application, and/or the AnyPlay™ application utilized by Comcast®, etc.) at the portable media devices (PMD).

Referring now to FIG. 3b , an exemplary embodiment of a network architecture 350 for enabling protected transfer of content from an in-premises DVR 352 is disclosed. In the illustrated embodiment, the requirement for transcryption is removed by using the same DRM algorithm to protect content on the DVR 352 and the portable device 354. Using the same algorithm for both applications enables the MSO to control and change usage rights and restrictions at any time up through content playback, and irrespective of any transfer of the content between devices.

In the illustrated embodiment, content is delivered from a content server 302 to a network DRM encryption entity 305 for encryption, then provided to a DVR 352 via a network (e.g., the MSO's distribution network 201) for recording. At the time of recording, the DVR 352 receives, either through a request to the DRM server 308, targeted unicast, or broadcast, a DRM license for the storage of the content. The DVR 352 uses the same DRM client as is used by the requesting devices (e.g., PMD 354) to request and process the DRM license. In one embodiment, the DRM license only includes rights for storage and playback on the DVR 352; alternatively additional rights may be conveyed in the DVR 352 DRM license as well (such as copy once, copy never, etc.). In the instance where the DVR 352 must re-encrypt the content (as discussed below) because it has utilized the same DRM client as the requesting PMD 354, the content key derived therefrom may be used for encryption.

As illustrated and in a manner similar to that discussed above with respect to FIG. 3a , the DRM server 308 consults a content key table 310 or other data structure to determine an appropriate key for delivery to the requesting devices (DVR 352 and PMD 354). In addition, the DRM server 308 is also configured to communicate with an entitlements database 306 (or use a comparable mechanism) to determine the rights of the devices and/or users to the requested content. These rights are included in the illustrated embodiment during generation of the DRM license at the DRM server 308.

In the embodiment of FIG. 3b , when a downstream client device 354 requests a DVR asset DEFINE ASSET, the DVR 352 downloads the protected asset to the client 354; if the content is in an appropriate format for the requesting client 354. If the content is not in an appropriate format for the requesting device 354, the DVR 352 uses its CA or DRM license to decrypt, transcode, then re-encrypt the DVR asset for the requesting downstream client device 354. If the content is in the appropriate format, the content is merely transmitted to the requesting device without processing. At the time of download or playback, the downstream device 354 requests its own DRM license for accessing the content from the DRM server 308, and not from the DVR 352. In one embodiment, the rights included in the DRM license include rights for off-line playback.

According to the embodiment of FIG. 3b , the DVR 352 implements the DRM algorithm to replace any proprietary encryption mechanism used in prior art DVR systems. In addition, the DVR 352 implements the DRM client to retrieve and process the DRM license in order to obtain the content key used for decryption and encryption of the content on the hard drive using the DRM algorithm (for subsequent transmission to client (e.g., PMD) 354 in communication therewith).

Exemplary methods to enable the foregoing functionalities will now be discussed in greater detail.

Methods

Referring now to FIG. 4a , one embodiment of a method 400 for transferring protected content in a premises network, such as that discussed above with respect to FIG. 3a , is illustrated. As shown, per step 402, the premises translation device (i.e., gateway 312) requests content from the network as if it were an end user (e.g., content rendering) device.

In order for the gateway 312 to encrypt the content (see discussion provided below), it must have the correct content key for that content element. Note that the content key is in the present embodiment symmetrical in nature, so the same content key is used to encrypt and decrypt. Thus, at step 404, the gateway 312 requests the DRM license from the DRM server 308. As noted above, the gateway 312 does not generate the content key and/or DRM license itself.

Per step 406, the DRM server 308, entitlements database 306, and content server 302 cooperate to determine whether the gateway 312 (and/or a subscriber associated thereto) is authorized and/or authenticated to receive the requested content. The use, reproduction, transfer, and/or other rights of the subscriber or device with respect to the content may also determined. Once the authentication/authorization (and rights as applicable) is determined, the requested content is provided to the gateway 312 from the content server 302 via the encryption entity 304 (step 408), such as in PowerKey format, and the DRM server 308 generates a DRM license for delivery to the gateway 312 as well (step 408). This may be accomplished via e.g., utilization of a content key table 310 or other data structure at the server 308, or a remote entity in communication therewith.

It is further noted that the foregoing authentication/authorization may be determined e.g., based on a subscriber ID or MAC address of a requesting device. This information may also constitute for instance a one-way cryptographic “hash” that anonymously yet uniquely identifies the ID or MAC address without divulging the identity of the user; see e.g., co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/186,452 filed on Jul. 20, 2005 and entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR BOUNDARY-BASED NETWORK OPERATION”, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, for one exemplary hashing approach useful with the present disclosure. Alternatively, a user may be required to “log-in” to the system in order to have content provided thereto. A log-in requirement is especially useful in Internet or other non-managed content delivery systems to ensure delivery to authorized users.

The gateway 312 in the illustrated exemplary HFC context tunes to the appropriate QAM for receiving the requested content, and begins decoding it. Next, at step 410, the gateway 312 transcodes the content. In one embodiment, content is received as PowerKey encrypted and MPEG-2 encoded content and, while translating the MPEG-2 content into MPEG-4 for subsequent requesting devices (e.g., CPE 206), the gateway 312 also transcrypts the content from PowerKey to the applicable DRM format (step 412).

Rather than the gateway 312 using the content key from the previously obtained DRM license for decryption and play-back (as is the normal function of the content key at a premises device), the gateway 312 uses the content key for translation or encryption. The gateway 312 encrypts the piece of content using well-known DRM encryption algorithms, then makes it available to the requesting device in the same way a network content server would. Hence, in one respect, the gateway can be thought of as a “local DRM-based content server” for any other premises devices.

As noted above, because the gateway 312 uses the same DRM client as the requesting device 206 to request the DRM license from the DRM server 308, the content key used in translation (i.e., by the gateway 312 to encrypt the content) is the same content key is provided to the client device 206 for decryption (see discussion below). This advantageously allows the gateway to provide a transparency or pass-through functionality with respect to the DRM license/rights.

At step 414, a request for content is received from the CPE 206 at the gateway device 312 and the content is provided thereto at step 416. When the requesting device 206 begins to play the content, it discovers that the content is encrypted, and therefore requests a DRM license for that content directly from the DRM server 308, and not from the gateway 312 (step 418). This allows the requesting device to implement a single DRM client and video pipeline that operate the same way whether the content is obtained through the gateway 312 (translation) or directly from the network 201.

At step 420, the DRM server 308 determines whether the requesting client 206 is authorized/authenticated to receive access to the content (and the rights associated therewith). As discussed above, this may be accomplished via a content key table 310 at the server 308 and communication of the server 308 to various network entities (including e.g., an entitlements database 306, billing entity, account management entity, etc.). When it is determined that the device 206 is authorized to receive access to the content, an appropriate DRM license is provided thereto (step 422) and the CPE 106 may begin decryption and playback according to the rights transmitted in the DRM license.

Another embodiment of a method 450 for the transmission of protected content within a premises network, such as that discussed above with respect to FIG. 3b , is illustrated at FIG. 4 b.

As shown, per step 452, a premises DVR 352 requests content from the content server 302. The DVR 352 also requests the DRM license from the DRM server 308 (at step 454). The DVR 352 utilizes the same DRM client as is used by the PMD 354 which will request the content. In this manner, both devices are able to access the content (via utilization of a DRM license obtained from the DRM server 308; as will be discussed below).

At step 456, the DRM server 308, in response to the request for the DRM license, determines whether the requesting DVR 352 is authorized/authenticated to receive access to the content, as well as the particular rights the DVR 352 (or its user) should be afforded. The DRM server 308, entitlements database 306, and content server 302 cooperate to determine the authentication/authorization of the DVR 352 (and/or a subscriber associated thereto). When it is determined that the device 352 is authorized/authenticated, the content is provided thereto from the content server 302 (via the DRM encryption entity 305; step 458). Additionally, the DRM server 308 generates a DRM license for delivery to the DVR 352 as well (step 458). This may be accomplished via utilization of a content key table 310 at the server 308. Authentication may occur, as discussed above, based on e.g., subscriber ID, MAC address, and/or other identifying information.

Next, per step 460, a PMD 354 requests content stored at the DVR 352. The DVR 352 determines whether the requested content is in an appropriate format to be utilized at the PMD 354, or whether processing is needed to convert the content to an appropriate format (step 462). If processing is needed, per step 464, the DVR 352 implements appropriate algorithms to transcode the content (such as from MPEG-2 to MPEG-4). In order to do so, however, the DVR 352 may first decrypt the content (using the content key within the DRM license), and then re-encrypt the content after translation (again using the content key within the DRM license). In other words, the content is transcrypted (step 466). In another embodiment, the transcryption step (step 466) may comprise causing the DVR 352 to, in a manner similar to the gateway 312 discussed above with respect to FIGS. 3a and 4a , receive content in a first encryption format (such as e.g., PowerKey) and decrypt/re-encrypt the content to a second format (such as e.g., DRM); see discussion above with respect to the aforementioned FIGS. 3a and 4 a.

If no processing of the content is needed, or once processing is completed, per step 468, the requested content is provided to the PMD 354. The PMD 354, upon attempting to play the content, discovers that it is encrypted and thus the PMD 354 requests its own DRM license from the DRM server 308 (see step 470). The DRM server 308 then determines, at step 472, whether the PMD 354 is authorized/authenticated to receive access to the content. As discussed above, this may be accomplished via a content key table 310 at the server 308 and communication of the server 308 to various network entities (including e.g., an entitlements database 306, billing entity, account management entity, etc.). When it is determined that the PMD 354 is authorized to receive access to the content, an appropriate DRM license is provided thereto (step 474) and the PMD 354 may begin decryption and playback according to the rights transmitted in the DRM license.

Other Configurations

In another embodiment, the aforementioned network architectures of FIGS. 3a and 3b may be used to implement a “download” paradigm for legacy or newly developed CA, TD, and DRM software and cryptographic protection schemes. This allows the network operator, and even the third party content provider by proxy, to exert additional control on viewing, reproduction, and migration of content distributed over the network. For example, the apparatus and methods disclosed in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/584,208 filed on Oct. 20, 2006 and entitled “DOWNLOADABLE SECURITY AND PROTECTION METHODS AND APPARATUS”, published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0098212 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,520,850 on Aug. 27, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, may be utilized. Specifically, the aforementioned network architectures of FIGS. 3a and 3b (network 300 and network 350) are configured to provide downloadable software modules (e.g., images), and an associated decryption key that facilitates decryption of the downloaded software images according to the herein described methods (see FIGS. 4a and 4b ). In contrast to the previously described approaches of merely encrypting the content itself (such as via a DES or AES algorithm/symmetric or asymmetric key approach), the download of secure software images according to the present embodiment ensures security of the downloaded images and enables migration of protected content to other platforms in the user or client domain so as to extend the “trusted domain”. In other words, the architecture of the present embodiment provides for a secure transmission of the DRM client software and related components, in addition to the secure delivery of the actual content.

The secure download approach of the present embodiment allows for ready implementation of future security upgrades or models, such as improved encryption algorithms and new DRM technologies. Additionally, utilization of a downloadable DRM module or image enables the present system to operate with both new and legacy CAS systems, including third party or retail devices (OEM devices). Devices that are connected to the operator's network utilize a prescribed process to ensure that the client device's download “host” has the correct software and cryptographic elements (e.g., keying) for operation on that network, regardless of whether the device comprises a lease or retail installation. This process advantageously enables client device hosts with inappropriate or no such software or cryptographic elements to acquire these components from the network securely.

The exemplary secure download architecture can also serve a variety of security environments and configurations ranging from the most basic (e.g., a low-end digital video service), to a high-end, multi-play environment with digital video, digital recording, multimedia, and data services. These environments can also include the ability to decrypt video delivered by the MSO, encrypt and decrypt content stored onto or retrieved from a hard drive (e.g., for PVR devices which require DRM), and decrypt and encrypt content delivered to or being sent from the TD.

The foregoing secure download embodiment may be further used to provide enhanced media provisioning capabilities. Media provisioning describes the process necessary to, inter alia, activate, configure, modify, and/or deactivate a CPE (e.g., downloadable conditional access (CA) system or “DCAS” host device) for operation within a content-based network. For example, the apparatus and methods of the co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/657,828 filed on Jan. 24, 2007 and entitled “APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR PROVISIONING IN A DOWNLOAD-ENABLED SYSTEM”, published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0177998, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,621,540 on Dec. 31, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, may be utilized. As discussed therein, a host device (including one or more entities associated therewith, such as the secure microprocessor (SM), is remotely managed by a Media Provisioning System (MPS) component of the network operator's larger provisioning system. The MPS (and the downloadable CA infrastructure described above) provides a secure, distributed system for the management of SM firmware configuration within download-capable host devices (“DCAS hosts”).

In one exemplary embodiment, the MPS handles DCAS provisioning, and executes work flows to manage provisioning and configuration policy within the operator's network. The MPS signals these policies to an authentication agent or proxy (AP). The AP has responsibility for interacting with the CA system's personalization server (PS), an entity useful for the personalization of software/firmware images on individual host devices, and is also responsible for enforcing the aforementioned provisioning and configuration policies. In this exemplary embodiment, the MPS distributes information pertaining to the SM of each DCAS host device activated within the network to a corresponding authentication proxy (AP) within the network's conditional access infrastructure. Thus, the MPS to maintain the topological context of each SM, the SM's identifying information, and the SM's operationally desired software configuration.

In yet another embodiment, the aforementioned network architectures of FIGS. 3a and 3b may be used to enable content delivery across managed and unmanaged networks. For example, the apparatus and methods disclosed in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/834,801 filed on Jul. 12, 2010 and entitled “APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR CONTENT MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNT LINKING ACROSS MULTIPLE CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORKS”, published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0008786 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,906,838on Feb. 27, 2018, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, may be utilized. As discussed therein, protected content is provided to subscribers of a managed (e.g., MSO) network via a content source accessible to the subscriber via the Internet or another external network.

In an exemplary embodiment, a user accesses a third party service provider (content source) website, and requests delivery of content (e.g., via on-demand type streaming, broadcast, high speed file download, etc.). If the particular content requested is protected content or content which is only accessible to certain types of subscribers, the service provider and/or MSO determines whether the requesting user is permitted to access the content (such as by using the entitlements database discussed above). The process by which it is determined whether a user may access content includes (i) authenticating the user as a subscriber to the MSO, and (ii) determining whether the subscriber's service/subscription level permits viewing of the requested content (and optionally one or more use restrictions). The process is advantageously agnostic to the underlying networks involved in both the request and content delivery processes.

In one variant, the user is authenticated by requiring him/her to establish a login identity and password, and/or assigning the user a GUID. The user's MAC address or IP address may also be used in this process. This unique information is stored at an MSO entity, and when the user requests content, the user must log into the MSO; the relevant information is retrieved and compared to information that the user has provided in their login. If valid login information is entered (i.e., the information provided matches the stored information for that user GUID), then a session is created between the MSO and user.

The aforementioned authentication at the MSO may be facilitated by various entities associated with the service provider. For instance, the user may first log in to a service provider's website, such as by establishing a login identity and password which are stored at the service provider's site. Once logged in, the service provider may forward requests to view content to an appropriate MSO and provide a platform for the user to log in to the MSO site.

In another variant, the service provider and MSO accounts for a particular user may be linked or federated. In other words, a trust relationship is established between the service provider and MSO, which is used to verify subscriber information. According to this embodiment, a given user will have MSO-specific information regarding its identity (such as login information for the MSO, GUID, etc.), and/or information regarding its subscription level and other service details stored at the service provider site. Messages received from the MSO representing permission for the user to access content may also be stored at the service provider site. The service provider may later reference this information when subsequent requests for content are made by the user for content, thereby providing faster and more efficient service.

In addition, the service provider is able to enforce security or rights management protection (e.g., DRM, encryption keys, etc.) on content authorized for delivery, by pre-positioning information enabling this protection (and specific to the requesting subscriber) at the service provider. Alternatively, the service provider may pre-configure the requested content based on one or more configuration parameters associated with the requesting device (e.g., codec support, DRM support, display capabilities, etc.). Information regarding a subscriber and/or devices rights to content is obtained from the DRM server.

Gateway Device

Referring now to FIG. 5a , an exemplary gateway device 312 for use with the systems and methods discussed in FIGS. 3a and 4a is illustrated. As shown, the device 312 generally comprises a premises network interface 512 configured to communicate with at least one CPE 206 via a respective premises network interface 522 thereof. The CPE 206 requests content from the gateway 312 via the aforementioned communication; the gateway 312 in turn requests the content from the network 502 (or receives the content as a part of a regularly scheduled broadcast).

In one embodiment, the gateway 312 comprises an RF front end for interface with the HFC network 201 of FIGS. 2-2 d. The gateway 312 may further comprise various components such as e.g., digital processor(s), storage device (memory), and a plurality of interfaces (e.g., video/audio interfaces, IEEE-1394 “Firewire” or Thunderbolt™, USB, serial/parallel ports, etc.) for interface with other end-user apparatus such as televisions, personal electronics, computers, Wi-Fi or other network hubs/routers, etc., which are not illustrated herein for clarity. A tuner interface 502 of the gateway 312 is tuned to an appropriate QAM channel to receive the requested QAM content from the network 201. In one embodiment, the content is encrypted using the aforementioned PowerKey encryption scheme. A cable card 504 of the type discussed previously herein (e.g., CableCard) is used by the gateway 312 to decrypt the content.

A transcoder/transcrypter 514 is also disposed at the gateway 312. The transcoder/transcrypter 514 receives the decrypted content from the cable card 504 and transcodes the content to an appropriate format for any devices within the premises which request the content. In one embodiment, content is received in MPEG-2 and is transcoded to MPEG-4 by the transcoder/transcrypter 514 within the gateway apparatus 312 for delivery to a requesting CPE 206 capable of utilizing MPEG-4 content. In the instance where content is received in a format which the requesting device is capable of utilizing, the transcoding step may be omitted. In addition, the gateway uses a DRM client 510 running thereon to request, via a DOCSIS interface 506, a DRM license from a DRM system 500. The transcoder/transcrypter 514 uses a content key within the DRM license to transcrypt the received content from e.g., PowerKey to DRM.

The transcoded and transcrypted content is then provided to a requesting CPE 206 via the previously discussed communication between the gateway 312 premises network interface 512 and the CPE 206 premises network interface 522.

The CPE 206, once it receives the requested content from the gateway 312, begins playback of the content. However, in order to effect such playback, the CPE 206 requires a DRM license (to decrypt the content). Hence, the CPE 206 of the embodiment of FIG. 5a is configured to run a DRM client 520 thereon. The DRM client 520 of the CPE 206 is in the exemplary implementation the same DRM client 510 as that run on the gateway 312 (or at least has comparable capabilities). In this manner, the CPE 206 is able to decrypt content using the same content key which was used by the gateway 312 to encrypt the content.

It is further noted that, in one embodiment, the gateway 312 may comprise a converged premises device, such as for example that described in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/378,129 filed Mar. 16, 2006, published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0217436, and entitled “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR CENTRALIZED CONTENT AND DATA DELIVERY”, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,347,341 on Jan. 1, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. As discussed therein, the apparatus (i.e., gateway 312) may comprise a remotely manageable premises device that, inter alia, acts as a centralized client networking platform providing gateway services such as network management as well as traditional content and high-speed data delivery functions to a plurality of CPE 206 in communication therewith. This premises device may be used, for example, as a shared internet (e.g., Internet) connection for all devices in the premises via a cable modem or other such interface, sharing personal and DVR content such as video, music and photos (and any associated metadata) throughout the premises, and providing both a wired and wireless network in the home. Telephony services utilizing e.g., embedded multimedia terminal adapter (eMTA) and/or Wi-Fi architectures may also be provided via the device; these services can make use of the network operator's indigenous VoIP or comparable telephony capability if desired, thereby providing an even more unified service environment.

It is further appreciated that, via the gateway 312, a wired home network utilizing existing coaxial cable in the premises may also be created, using e.g., an Ethernet-to-coaxial bridge technology based on the MoCA specification. This allows existing devices and DVRs to connect and share content with the gateway 312, and also allows the network operator (e.g., MSO) to control and manage the premises coaxial network. In addition, the gateway 312 may be configured to be accessible via any remote device with internetworking (e.g., Internet) capability, thereby allowing content to be accessed by the user from outside the premises.

Still further, it is noted that the CPE 206 may comprise various other components including e.g., various processing layers (e.g., DOCSIS MAC or DAVIC OOB channel, MPEG, etc.) as well as media processors and other specialized SoC or ASIC devices. The CPE 206 may also comprise an integrated HD decoder, thereby relieving any connected monitors or other devices from the requirement of having such a decoder. These additional components and functionality are well known to those of ordinary skill in the cable and embedded system fields, and accordingly not described further herein.

It is also noted that, in order to perform a playback function (via the media player 524), the CPE 206 may also provided with an OCAP-compliant application and Java-based middleware which, inter alia, manages the operation of the device and applications running thereon (including the aforementioned DRM client 520 and other applications necessary for causing transcoding, transcryption, communication, etc). Alternatively, different middlewares (e.g., MHP, ARIB, or ACAP) may be used in place of the OCAP middleware discussed above.

It will be recognized by those of ordinary skill that myriad different device and software architectures may be used consistent with the selective enforcement functions of the present disclosure, the gateway 312 and CPE 206 devices of FIG. 5a being merely exemplary.

DVR

FIG. 5b illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a DVR 352 for use with the architectures and methods discussed in FIGS. 3b and 4b , respectively.

As shown in the diagram of FIG. 5b , the exemplary DVR 352 generally comprises a network interface 560 configured to receive content from an HFC network. In one embodiment, the interface comprises an RF tuner of the type discussed above with respect to the gateway 312 device of FIG. 5a . In a further embodiment, the DVR 352 may also include a CableCard for decryption of PowerKey encrypted content. Alternatively, the received content may comprise DRM encrypted content.

Content may be selected for delivery to the DVR 352 by a user thereof, or may be selected by a user of a remote device, such as a PMD 354, for delivery to and storage at the DVR 352. In another embodiment, content may be provided to the DVR 352 automatically, such as based on a broadcast thereof to all devices within a service node, or via a unicast (e.g., based on an identified tendency of a user to be interested in the content or content similar to that which is automatically delivered). For example, the methods and apparatus disclosed in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/414,576 filed on Mar. 30, 2009 and entitled “RECOMMENDATION ENGINE APPARATUS AND METHODS”, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,215,423 on Dec. 15, 2015, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, may be used in conjunction with the foregoing to cause content to be automatically stored at the DVR 352. As discussed therein, content targeted to a particular user (or group of users) within a content-based network, such as a cable television or satellite network is identified and recommended. Specifically, a mechanism is utilized to particularly select content to align with a user's preferences (the latter which the viewer need not enter manually). The content provided to the user is compiled from various distinct sources, including, inter alia, DVR, broadcasts, VOD systems, start over systems, etc. In addition, the provided mechanism may learn (and unlearn) the user's preferences and which content they are likely to enjoy based on actions taken with regard to previously provided (recommended) content.

The content received at the DVR 352 is processed at a transcoder/transcrypter 552. The transcoder/transcrypter 552 is configured to process the content received from the network 201 into a format and encryption scheme utilized by requesting PMD 354. As noted above, in one embodiment, the content is received in a format (e.g., MPEG-2, MPEG-4, etc.) which is compatible with a requesting PMD 354, hence no transcoding is necessary in that instance. However, if the content requires transcoding, the DVR 352 will do so by first decrypting the content using a content key retrieved from a DRM license. The DRM license is obtained via a request from the DRM client 554 of the DVR 352 to the DRM system 500 sent over a DOCSIS interface 550. Alternatively, or in addition, the content may be received having an appropriate DRM or other encryption scheme and therefore may not necessitate transcryption by the DVR 352.

The content is stored at a mass storage device 558 (e.g. HDD or the like). In one embodiment, the content is stored at the storage entity 558 in the format it is received and is only transcoded/transcrypted as necessary, such as when a request for the content from a PMD 354 is received. Alternatively, the DVR 352 may utilize information regarding the capabilities of PMD 354 registered thereto and preemptively transcode and/or transcrypt the content to one or more formats which are compatible with one or more PMD 354 prior to storage thereof at the HDD 558.

As shown, content is requested by the PMD 354 via communication of a DVR interface 562 thereof to a PMD interface 556 of the DVR 352. The requested content is also delivered over these interfaces. The communication may comprise a wired or wireless interface including e.g., FireWire (e.g., FW400, FW800, etc.), USB (e.g., USB2), Ethernet (e.g., 10/100, 10/100/1000 (Gigabit Ethernet), 10-Gig-E, etc.), Ethernet-to-coaxial bridge technology, MoCA, Wi-Fi (802.11), WiMAX (802.16), cellular (e.g., 3G, LTE/LTE-A/TD-LTE, GSM, etc.), Bluetooth, etc.

When the PMD 354 attempts to playback the content (via its media player 564), it is determined that a content key is needed to decrypt the content. Hence, as shown, the PMD 354 further comprises a DRM client 566 which is used to communicate with the DRM system 500 to obtain the DRM license. As discussed elsewhere herein, the various entities at the DRM system 500 and at the network 201 cooperate to determine appropriate rights of the user and/or requesting device to content; these are used to generate the DRM license. It is also noted that the DRM client 566 of the PMD 354 is the same as (or has similar functionality to) the DRM client 554 of the DVR 352. In this manner, the content key which is used to encrypt the content at the DVR 352 is the same content key received by the PMD 354 for decryption.

The illustrated DVR 352 and/or PMD 354 may include various other components which are not illustrated herein (for clarity). For example, the network interface 560 of the DVR 352 may comprise e.g., an OpenCable (OCAP)-compliant embedded system having an RF front end (including tuner and demodulator/decryptors) for interface with the HFC network 201 of FIGS. 2-2 d. Additional digital processors, storage devices (memory), and interfaces (e.g., video/audio interfaces, Firewire or Thunderbolt™, USB, serial/parallel ports, etc.) may also be provided in the DVR 352 and/or PMD 354.

Other components which may be utilized within the DVR 352 and/or PMD 354 include various processing layers (e.g., DOCSIS MAC or DAVIC OOB channel, MPEG, etc.) as well as media processors and other specialized SoC or ASIC devices. The DVR 352 and/or PMD 354 may also comprise an integrated HD decoder.

In one variant, the client applications necessary for providing the foregoing functionalities of the DVR 352 and/or PMD 354 of FIG. 5b comprise OCAP-compliant applications which operate via Java-based middleware (including the aforementioned DRM clients, and other applications necessary for causing transcoding, transcryption, communication, etc.). It will be recognized by those of ordinary skill that myriad different device and software architectures may be used consistent with the selective enforcement functions of the present disclosure, the devices of FIG. 5b being merely exemplary. For example, different middlewares (e.g., MHP, ARIB, or ACAP) may be used.

In yet another embodiment, the foregoing functionality of the gateway 312 and/or DVR 342 may be implemented on a media bridging apparatus such as that disclosed in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/480,597 filed on Jun. 8, 2009, entitled “MEDIA BRIDGE APPARATUS AND METHODS”, published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0313225, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,602,864 on Mar. 21, 2017, and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. As discussed therein, the device (e.g., the gateway 312 and/or DVR 342) acts as a connection between a portable media device (PMD) and a user's home network. This bridging apparatus may be used, for example, to convert content stored on one client device (such as e.g., the PMD 354 or CPE 206) to a format capable of being presented on a user's set-top box or other client device. Control of the presentation is also provided by the bridging apparatus. For instance, in one embodiment, the apparatus enables a user to access and control playback of media from a first device via a user interface associated with a second device. The media bridging apparatus may also enable media content from a device within a premises network to be accessed via extant networks for distribution to any STB, PC, mobile device, or other PMD outside the premises network.

It will be recognized that while certain aspects of the disclosure are described in terms of a specific sequence of steps of a method, these descriptions are only illustrative of the broader methods of the disclosure, and may be modified as required by the particular application. Certain steps may be rendered unnecessary or optional under certain circumstances. Additionally, certain steps or functionality may be added to the disclosed embodiments, or the order of performance of two or more steps permuted. All such variations are considered to be encompassed within the disclosure herein.

While the above detailed description has shown, described, and pointed out novel features of the disclosure as applied to various embodiments, it will be understood that various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form and details of the device or process illustrated may be made by those skilled in the art. The foregoing description is of the best mode presently contemplated. This description is in no way meant to be limiting, but rather should be taken as illustrative of the general principles of the disclosure. The scope of the disclosure should be determined with reference to the claims. 

What is claimed is:
 1. Computerized apparatus configured to provide digitally rendered content to at least one computerized client device, said computerized apparatus comprising: a first data interface configured to support data communication between the computerized apparatus and at least a portion of a content delivery network; a second data interface configured to support data communication with the at least one computerized client device; digital processor apparatus in data communication with the first data interface and the second data interface; and storage apparatus in data communication with the digital processor apparatus and having at least one computer program, the at least one computer program comprising a plurality of instructions which are configured to, when executed by the digital processor apparatus: transmit data representative of a request for the digitally rendered content to computerized content server apparatus of the content delivery network; transmit data representative of a request for content protection data to digital rights management (DRM) server apparatus of the content delivery network; receive the digitally rendered content and the content protection data from the computerized content server apparatus and the DRM server apparatus, respectively, via at least the first data interface; process the digitally rendered content using at least the content protection data to produce protected digitally rendered content; and cause delivery of the protected digitally rendered content to the at least one computerized client device via at least the second data interface; wherein the protected digitally rendered content requires the at least one computerized client device to obtain and utilize at least a portion of the content protection data from the DRM server apparatus of the content delivery network in order for the at least one computerized client device to decode and render the protected digitally rendered content.
 2. The computerized apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processing of the digitally rendered content using at least the content protection data comprises: (i) decryption of the digitally rendered content by use of the at least portion of the content protection data; (ii) transcoding of the digitally rendered content from a first encoding format to a second encoding format; and (iii) re-encryption of the digitally rendered content by use of the at least portion of the content protection data.
 3. The computerized apparatus of claim 1, wherein the transmission of the data representative of the request for the content protection data is performed by an application computer program of the computerized apparatus, the application computer program of the computerized apparatus comprising an application computer program with identical capabilities as an application computer program used by the at least one computerized client device to request the digitally rendered content from the computerized apparatus.
 4. The computerized apparatus of claim 3, wherein use of the application computer program of the computerized apparatus and the application computer program used by the at least one computerized client device enables the DRM server apparatus of the content delivery network to control at least one of usage rights or restrictions at any time during playback of the digitally rendered content on the at least one computerized client device, and irrespective of any transfer of the digitally rendered content between the at least one computerized client device and the computerized apparatus; wherein the usage rights and the restrictions are each associated with the digitally rendered content.
 5. The computerized apparatus of claim 3, wherein the application computer program of the computerized apparatus and the application computer program used by the at least one computerized client device each comprise common encryption or decryption capabilities and execute an identical DRM algorithm.
 6. The computerized apparatus of claim 1, wherein: the computerized apparatus further comprises a digital data mass storage device disposed in a premises of a user of the at least one computerized client device; the at least one computerized client device comprises a portable media device; and the content protection data comprises a content key of a DRM license associated with the digitally rendered content.
 7. The computerized apparatus of claim 1, wherein the plurality of instructions are further configured to, when executed by the digital processor apparatus: determine that the digitally rendered content received from the computerized content server apparatus is in a first format incompatible with the at least one computerized client device; and based at least in part on the determination, transcode the digitally rendered content from the first format to a second format, the second format compatible with the at least one computerized client device.
 8. A system for securely providing digitally rendered content to at least one computerized client device associated with a user premises, the user premises comprising a data connection in communication with a content delivery network, the system comprising: first computerized apparatus; digital content server apparatus configured to provide the digitally rendered content to the first computerized apparatus via the content delivery network; and digital rights management (DRM) server apparatus configured to provide content protection data to the first computerized apparatus and the at least one computerized client device via the content delivery network; wherein the first computerized apparatus comprises: a first data interface configured to receive the digitally rendered content from the digital content server apparatus; a first DRM client application configured to: cause transmission of data representative of a request for the content protection data to the DRM server apparatus; and based at least on receipt of the content protection data from the DRM server apparatus and receipt of the digitally rendered content from the digital content server apparatus, utilize at least a portion of the content protection data to protect the digitally rendered content; and a second data interface configured to deliver the protected digitally rendered content to the at least one computerized client device; and wherein the at least one computerized client device comprises: a second DRM client application configured to: cause transmission of data representative of a request for the content protection data to the DRM server apparatus; and based at least on receipt of the content protection data from the DRM server apparatus and receipt of the protected digitally rendered content from the first computerized apparatus, utilize the content protection data to process the protected digitally rendered content so as to gain access to the digitally rendered content.
 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the first DRM client application and the second DRM client application comprise at least one of (i) common encryption capabilities, or (ii) common decryption capabilities.
 10. The system of claim 8, wherein the protection and the processing of the digitally rendered content are each effected via use of a same DRM algorithm executed respectively by the first DRM client application and the second DRM client application, the use of the same DRM algorithm enabling the DRM server apparatus to control at least one of usage rights or restrictions associated with the digitally rendered content, at any time during playback of the digitally rendered content on the at least one computerized client device, and irrespective of any transfer of the digitally rendered content between the at least one computerized client device and the first computerized apparatus.
 11. The system of claim 8, wherein the protection and the processing of the digitally rendered content are each effected via use of a same DRM algorithm executed respectively by the first DRM client application and the second DRM client application, the use of the same DRM algorithm obviating a need for the first computerized apparatus to decrypt and re-encrypt the digitally rendered content.
 12. The system of claim 8, wherein the first computerized apparatus is configured to transcode the digitally rendered content from a first encoding format to a second encoding format, the first encoding format comprising a Moving Pictures Experts Group (MPEG)-2 format, and the second encoding format comprising an MPEG-4 AVC (Advanced Video Codec) format.
 13. The system of claim 8, wherein the transmission, by the first DRM client application of the first computerized apparatus, of the data representative of the request for the content protection data to the DRM server apparatus comprises transmission of a hash value anonymously identifying the first computerized apparatus, the content protection data created based at least in part on a determination that the first computerized apparatus is entitled to receive access thereto, the determination based at least in part on communication of the DRM server apparatus with one or more entitlement entities of the system and comprising use of the hash value by the one or more entitlement entities.
 14. The system of claim 8, wherein the DRM server apparatus is configured to authenticate at least the first computerized apparatus, the authentication comprising: identification of a current subscription or service level of a user of the first computerized apparatus; and determination of one or more rights of the user based at least on the current subscription or service level.
 15. The system of claim 8, wherein: the DRM server apparatus is configured to authenticate the at least one computerized client device; the authentication is based at least in part on information unique to the at least one computerized client device or a user thereof and stored at an entity of the content delivery network; and the unique information and the content protection data are pre-positioned at an entity of a non-managed internetwork for subsequent requests for other digitally rendered content, the subsequent requests originating from the at least one computerized client device; wherein the non-managed internetwork is in data communication with the content delivery network.
 16. The system of claim 8, wherein the first DRM client application of the first computerized apparatus is further configured to: (i) decrypt the digitally rendered content by use of the content protection data; (ii) transcode the digitally rendered content from a first encoding format to a second encoding format; and (iii) re-encrypt the digitally rendered content by use of the content protection data.
 17. A computerized method for securely receiving digitally rendered content at a computerized client device within a content delivery network, the computerized method comprising: transmitting data representative of a request for the digitally rendered content to a proxy computerized apparatus; receiving the digitally rendered content from the proxy computerized apparatus, the received digitally rendered content comprising digitally rendered content encrypted by using content protection data and a first digital rights management (DRM) algorithm executed on the proxy computerized apparatus; transmitting data representative of a request for the content protection data to DRM server apparatus; and based on receiving the content protection data from the DRM server apparatus, utilizing the content protection data and a second DRM algorithm executed on the computerized client device to render the digitally rendered content for viewing; wherein the second DRM algorithm and the first DRM algorithm each effect identical DRM-related functions.
 18. The computerized method of claim 17, wherein the receiving of the content protection data from the DRM server apparatus comprises receiving data indicative of authentication, the authentication based at least in part on a Media Access Control (MAC) address associated with the computerized client device.
 19. The computerized method of claim 17, wherein the identical DRM-related functions effected by the second DRM algorithm and the first DRM algorithm obviate a need for transcrypting the digitally rendered content at the proxy computerized apparatus.
 20. The computerized method of claim 17, wherein the receiving of the content protection data from the DRM server apparatus comprises receiving a DRM license, and the computerized method further comprises: processing the DRM license to obtain the content protection data, the content protection data comprising a content key, the content key and the DRM license generated at the DRM server apparatus. 